Farewell Sex and the City

Hadley Freeman mourns the death of Sex and the City in The Guardian with quite possibly the best opening lines for a film review, ever:
"I'm not asking for much. I just don't want to be sick in my mouth. I don't want to leave the cinema feeling like I've paid £7.50 to be mocked, patronised and kicked in the face. I don't want to be filled with despair at Hollywood's increasing inability to conceive of women in comedic films as anything other than self-obsessed babies with breasts. And I don't, most of all, want to spend two hours watching dreams and memories from my youth being trampled into humiliating self-parody. Is that too much to ask?"
Apparently the first movie was bad and the second is even worse. I'm glad I stopped watching the tv show when I did, to be honest. As SATC2 fever really gets into its stride, I picked up last week's copy of Stylist magazine that had been languishing in my desk drawer waiting for a free moment. There was a four-page piece on what men think of the characters in Sex and the City. Four well-written opinion pieces from writers who, understandably, challenge the perceptions that fans of the show will have of these characters and what they represent to women and society. So, after reading through all this, what conclusion did Alix Walker come to?
"Getting a male insight into the characters we have such a strong relationship with is pretty revealing, and reaffirms something we've known about men for years - they don't really get us!"
So, they've basically asked four writers to deliver a piece on a television show which they have clearly spent hours watching, whether they enjoyed it or not, and all Stylist can find to say is 'you just don't get us'? I don't know which I hate more, the impending SATC2 movie or this magazine.

Life drawing at 40 Winks

Last night I attended a life drawing evening at the beautiful 40 Winks with the fabulous ladies from Kink Ink. We were greeted at the door by Mr Carter in his top hat and, despite Rae's best efforts, were not put on the naughty list and so were allowed in. Just as well really, as I don't think Beth and I would have been terribly impressed at missing out on the Hendrick's cocktails! Once inside, we removed our shoes and padded around the place in slippers, marvelling at the beautiful decor and the pretty little touches, like door keys with gigantic tassels on them and necklaces hanging from the wall-lights in the bathroom. Once we had sipped some gin from pretty teacups and mingled a little, we were all given pencils and paper and told to head to one of three locations around the house to begin drawing. Beth, Rae and I started off in the music room.

I perched on a window seat and stared at the corseted and feather-draped Julie, perched on a stool looking elegant and regal. I stared at her and then stared at the blank page before me. How on earth did I do this years ago? After what felt like an age, I finally put my pencil on the paper and attempted to begin making marks. It was tricky, but something was emerging and it didn't look a million miles away from what I could see. Not quite close enough for my liking though. Still, I think this was my first attempt at life drawing since 1997 so things were bound to get off to a slow start! After 25 minutes, we were moved into the garden where Maria was waiting with her roller skates and headphones. I stared in awe but, being one of the last outside, couldn't find anywhere to sit so headed back indoors to perch on the stairs and gaze from afar. Drawing number two did not go terribly well, but Mr Carter kindly reminded me that getting a perfect likeness was not all that the evening was about.

For our final drawing of the evening, we headed upstairs again to find Cecilia draped across a sofa in the parlour wearing pretty little cat ears and holding a cane. I started to draw but, with no access to an eraser this time, I swiftly became frustrated with my inability to translate our wonderful cat woman's curves onto the page and so decided to rethink my approach. For the remainder of the time I wrote the following over the top of my failed drawing:
I came along tonight hoping to get back into drawing in a fun way. I thought this would be a good way to get started again without feeling intimidated as it's not a traditional setting. However, what I discovered was, not only do I need a lot more practice to get back the skills I once had and translate what I can see into something recognisable and pleasing on the page, but I also need to want to draw.

As I saw these women sitting, standing and laying for us, I realised I didn't want to draw them... I wanted to photograph them... I wanted to write about them. I've moved on since university and my desire to express myself has now found new outlets. Instead of wishing I was good at something else, I should concentrate on the things that I am good at. Like writing. Well, maybe I'm not good at writing but I certainly enjoy it! I also love taking photographs. I'd like to organise a session like this where someone poses for a while so that I can capture all the little details. All the details I can see but can't draw!

We can't be good at everything and, when all else fails... there's always gin :-)
Yesterday reminded me that the one thing I can't live without is wonderful people, and that I should stop beating myself up over all the things I don't have time to do. If my friends can do certain things better than me, I should leave them to it and stop being jealous of their talents. After all, I have talents of my own. They're just not necessarily what I thought they were.

Seth MacFarlane: epic fail

Last night I watched the Family Guy episode "Quagmire's Dad" which is certainly the least funny episode of the show I have ever seen, and also definitely the most offensive. Nothing new there, you might think. Another adult cartoon losing its edge and going down the pan. Well, yeah, I thought that when Brian and Stewie got locked in a bank vault with no food and a dirty nappy (which was just as unfunny as it sounds), but this really was something else. The main story is that Quagmire's father is suspected to be gay by Peter and Joe but, when confronted about this by Glenn, admits to being a trans woman. If you watch the show, I'm sure you can begin to imagine how they dealt with this one.

I searched the internet for what everyone else was saying about this episode and did come across quite a few people saying that Family Guy is always making fun out of pretty much everyone and everything, so why get offended... it's just a cartoon. One commenter on Queerty's post about the episode said: "Any viewer imbecilic enough to be offended by the lack of 'sensitivity' on Family Guy needs to start over again with fucking Sesame Street". Well, how about being offended by the lack of funny material in a supposed comedy show, eh? I have been shocked by comedy before (most recently by a live performer joking about rape) but, if it's funny, it can be challenging. There's nothing challenging or helpful about a character telling her daughter to throw away food made by a trans woman and there's certainly nothing at all entertaining about a character vomiting for 30 seconds when he finds out he's had sex with a trans woman. I mean, seriously, WTF?

After Elton's Brent Hartinger asked, "Is Family Guy's Seth MacFarlane a complete idiot?" and I have to say that I think the answer is yes. Why the hell else would he write such rubbish and think it was "probably the most sympathetic portrayal of a transexual character that has ever been on television"?

Here's to friends


Tea and scones
Originally uploaded by lipsticklori
I was chatting with a friend last week who was complimenting me on my burlesque performance work. I was preparing a less structured piece for an event he was running at the weekend and he was very excited about it, telling me that he'd loved my last two burlesque acts and that I should try doing some solo stuff, away from The Rebel Rebels, because I'm definitely good enough. I pondered this for a while and then realised something. The thought of trekking across London to do a 5 minute piece for people I don't know really doesn't excite me, but the thought of putting together a performance as part of a show or event I'm working on with friends is thrilling. I like the collaboration, rather than just showing up. Most of all, I love working with my friends.

I enjoy planning burlesque shows with the other Rebels. I enjoy photographing some of my friends' performance art pieces. I love discussing creative projects over tea and cake. I like offering advice to my friends when they're in need. I enjoy the cocktails and amusingly-named quiz teams. I like hanging around outside the changing rooms to offer an opinion, catching up on overnight tweets from the other side of the world, being there for moral support during piercings, and arranging crazy and/or inspiring photoshoots. The good times and the bad times are worth it because they're my friends and they're wonderful. When I'm feeling down, they pick my right back up again. I hope I always do the same for you.

Live long and prosper

At the end of the month, I'm off to a sci-fi themed party and so have used this as an excuse to purchase a made-to-measure original series Star Trek uniform in engineering red. My idea was to go all Vulcan but there is one flaw in this plan. Not the ears, or the eyebrows, or the emotions - I have solutions to all those problems. No, the one thing I can't manage is the vulcan salute. Practice makes perfect, right?

Speaking of having a long and prosperous life, it looks like the Liberal Democrats might not have one if they do decide to side with Team Conservative in this new hung parliament of ours. The Guardian mentions that:
"According to Tim Horton, research director of the Fabian Society, in polling by YouGov, 43% of Lib Dem voters describe themselves as left or centre-left, with 29% seeing themselves as centrist and 9% as centre-right or right. Horton goes on to argue that 15 of the 57 Lib Dem seats would fall to Labour at the next election if just one in five of their voters switched to that party."

Your vote counts

Via The Guardian's general election 2010 live blog, here's an extract from Nick Clegg's speech in Eastbourne this morning:
"Just imagine how you might feel if you wake up on Friday morning and discover instead that the Labour party and Gordon Brown are back in power having let you down. Just imagine how you are going to feel if you wake up on Friday morning and find the Conservatives and David Cameron in Number 10 just because they think they are entitled to have a turn. Making promises you know you can't trust, making promises you know they will break. Because you know that if that happens, if David Cameron or Gordon Brown get into Number 10, nothing - nothing - will really change at all."
I already know where my vote is going tomorrow. Do you?

Iron Man 2

Yesterday I watched Iron Man 2. Nothing amazing about this fact, you might think, but it says a lot about this film because we are rarely so excited about a movie that we'll brave the opening weekend crowds and idiocy to see it. Having enjoyed the first one tremendously, and having seen exciting trailers for the follow up on both small and large screens, this really was something to get excited about... and it didn't disappoint! With Robert Downey Jr returning as the lovable rogue Tony Stark, Iron Man cheerleaders, and Mickey Rourke trashing the Monaco Grand Prix with the use of some pretty vicious whips, this film was just as exciting as I'd hoped it would be. The action was good, the plot was reasonably fast throughout, and the whole thing was just as believable as a comic book movie should be (i.e. not very) so I left the cinema with a huge grin and a desire for an Iron Man suit that folds down into a suitcase.

However, one small thing is still bothering me today. Why put a couple of strong characters like Pepper Potts and Natalie Rushman into such submissive outfits for most of the movie? Gwyneth Paltrow and Scarlett Johansson were squeezed into dresses that appeared to force their hips back and allowed for little more than geisha steps, whilst also being required to totter around in vertiginous Louboutin heels that they clearly didn't have the balance for. I can see why someone thought the outfits would be sexy and powerful but, if you can't move in a sexy and powerful way whilst wearing them, the effect is totally lost. When Johansson changed into her catsuit, I could not have been more pleased. And this is from someone who loves form-fitting dresses and classic high heels.